Erasing the Cracks

 

Just like an old notebook, cities can get messy over time. Cracks and flaws come about in sidewalks, buildings, roads, and even opportunities. But a lot of times, those cracks aren’t the end of the world, they just serve as another chance to rebuild cleaner, safer, and stronger, a chance to erase and rewrite, not throw away.

Gentrification usually gets a bad reputation, and for obvious reasons. No one wants to see their home become grotesque, families forced to move out, or rents raised; but not every correction has to be punishing, just like revising a draft, some changes actually help make the story clearer and more spectacular, some changes actually give the community a new life instead of destroying it.

The new communities that gentrification brings aren’t bland, or cultureless. It brings safer streets, better schools, new and improved parks, more businesses, and a lot more job opportunities to communities that didn’t even have access to those before. It literally turns the old crack in the sidewalk into a whole new coffee shop, an area beaming with life where there once was none. A place that offers a job for those who couldn’t find one previously. Tell me, which would you rather have? Some studies actually show that long-term, less-educated residents who stay in their homes instead of moving, which is most poorer people when gentrification does happen, don’t necessarily see rent increases and can even benefit from the improved benefits gentrification brings and the increased property value of their home. That’s a whole lot better than the non-gentrifying neighborhoods that lose population and experience declining incomes over periods of time.

For so many years Detroit was seen as empty, flawed, and lifeless. But now, with one change at a time, I begin to see some clear improvement. The process continues today, when I see new shops being opened, old buildings being restored, the city filled with energy again, and now even I’m visiting very frequently. So, just like revising an essay, not every part gets removed, and not all the marks turn out to be mistakes. It’s about improving what has already been there in the past and about making it so that everyone can live a better and more opportunistic life. I can’t see why gentrification is depicted as destruction, when it’s rebuilding with a purpose.

Comments

  1. Aadhav PillaiNovember 2, 2025 at 10:01 AM

    I like how you connected gentrification to something local (detroit). I still do think that while improving neighbourhoods is good, a priority during the renovations should be hiring local workers so they aren't displaced or unemployed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Berry’s BlogNovember 2, 2025 at 11:48 AM

    I think you made a very good argument as to why gentrification is good. However, I think the rebirth of the city comes at a very strong cost that you may not see. Those people who stay, while their rent may not be raised, the price of their food, water, electricity is all raised. Also, gentrification does not mean that those people will get jobs. Therefore, the real problem is just covered up.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Una DomazetNovember 2, 2025 at 7:43 PM

    I really like how you offered a different perspective on gentrification rather than focusing on the effects of it that we have been talking about in class. You made a really great connection to our real lives by using Detroit at your example in this piece!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Arthur ChengNovember 9, 2025 at 8:21 AM

    I really liked how you opened a new perspective on gentrification despite the fact that it is seen as a negative. It really is an interesting take on gentrification. However, it may not always be good.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Erasing the “Rules”

Image
  Up until now, and probably for the rest of high school, sleepovers with friends are a no go. This is more of a non-negotiable and still feels highly unnecessary. All my friends have sleepovers, and absolutely nothing happens. But usually rules like these don’t come out of thin air, they come from somewhere deeper than simple logic and explanation. Throughout the past week in chapters 8-10 of The Best We Could Do we undoubtedly see how Thi Bui’s parents carry the hold onto the weight of war, escape, and instability, and it floods right into their parenting. The rules they have, like about answering the door, aren’t explained but simply followed. Things like these might feel severe but when you understand what they’ve lived through (escaping Vietnam, rebuilding from dust, generational trauma) these rules start to make perfect sense. They aren’t about controlling but protecting the ones they love. When you see just how quickly safety fades away, you don’t take chances with any pe...
Read more

Erasing Names, not Identity

Image
My father’s name is Bassam, but almost every American calls him Sam. However, unlike the text, The F Word, by Dumas which we read this week, my father never complained about the change or felt that it removed an important aspect of his life. For him, it was just something more simple for Americans to say, something flippant. Although the F Word highlights that someone’s name can carry heavy weight in terms of their personal identity, my father’s experience clearly demonstrates that not everyone views it that way. Some view their name as more practical. Especially when some refugees and immigrants are working incredibly hard just to get by, a name is the absolute last thing anyone could worry about. Now, I’m absolutely not saying that Dumas’s experience is wrong, but I’m aware of the fact that this obviously doesn’t represent all people trying to settle in the US. But this difference highlights something important; sometimes a person’s identity isn’t as fragile as we think. To my dad,...
Read more

Erasing The Bias in Our Society

Image
  In the Old Testament of the Bible, specifically the book of Samuel, there is a very popular story that takes place. For those that are unfamiliar, the record of David and Goliath is typically remembered as a battle of strength, where a small shepherd takes down a massive warrior, overcoming massive odds and proving just about every Israelite wrong. But besides all of the armor, stones, and fighting, the story tells us a lot about perception, as the Israelites assumed they would see David’s defeat before the fight even began. The people misunderstood each character’s size and strength for their own kismet. In a more recent context, people make the same habits, not during battles or competitions, but in everyday life. Now just imagine if everyone viewed David as the villain. The person with no armor, no physique, nothing a sling and 5 smooth stones from a stream. It feels like it wouldn’t be possible. I mean how could the people be so dumb as to view Goliath, a six foot nine, o...
Read more